🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities is set to be cut by more than half, after a divisive legislative amendment that required local governments to submit the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more councillors based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to elect a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments could only create a Indigenous seat by first submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Local populations frequently spent years generating local support and pushing their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating communities ought to determine whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a crucial move in reinstating local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to policies intended to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it wants to end “ethnic-specific” approaches, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – six of the seven cities mandated to hold referendums backed Māori wards, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of citizens casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to create different wards – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards indicated the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that voted to retain their seats.